Is democracy the best form of governance? Essay

Democracy is debatably , by furthest the most challenging form of plaque for both, politicians and the the great unwashed. Though body politic is lots described as the government elected by the community, there are cases where a countrys decision to change from an authoritarian administration to a democratic one has been forced upon by foreign interventions. However, youthful political insurgency in countries where democracy has been seed shows that for the throng to rattling accept and respect the ideals of democracy, it must grow naturally. Many argue that interventions bay window be successful given the right conditions. For instance chances of the democratic proceedings being successful if the state has a stable economy is relatively higher. There have been past successes like Ger umteen and Japan after domain of a function War II where imposition of democracy has worked. It is also seen that in many cases without intervention, the individuals who were seeking to d efend their rights in their homeland would have been unsuccessful.For example the peoples motility in Libya, though it had gained much suport would have been stifled had it non been for the NATOs involvement. There is also the concept that promoting democracy promotes peace. If people are given their freedom to air their views and feelings of marginalization are pr all the sameted so terrorism is slight likely to arise. Thus promoting democracy by imposing it, we increase the chances of a composed world. Many believe that democracy is the outstrip form of governance which ensures that the rights of the citizens are not violated and gives them the freedom to comport their ideas and thus it is their humanitarian obligation to bring democracy to those who do not have it. On the contrary, it is believed that an intervention is very likely to fail as the government is being formed against the countrys will and is less likely to gain support. Democratic governments prove to be suc cessful that when the government is chosen by the people and is more likely to affirmation respect and maintain order. Democracies are not necessarily more peaceful than other form of governments.Just because democracies have not gone to state of war in the past does not mean that it is less likely to go into war in the future. Invasions, mainly by the western nations, increase the strain between the East and the West and force the formation of terrorist groups which in tress threatens world peace. The 9/11 attack is proof enough to sound out that imposing democracy fuels terrorist groups. In Osama Bin Ladens earn to the American people he cited interventions in Somalia, India,Palestine, Chechnya, Lebanon and Iraq as reasons for the attack. Just because we rank and believe on political self determination being an strategic value, it does not mean that all nations believe in it too. For instance almost nations whitethorn prioritize on religious value and prefer to be comm and by a government which promises divine authority. And some may believe in stability of the government and might not involve it to keep on changing every few years.Countries of the middle atomic number 99 like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan and so on can be taken as examples while considering countries which are non-democratic and peaceful. Taking recent happenings into consideration, western efforts to impose democracy has largely failed. For instance in countries like Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam the imposition of democracy has led to political instability but still western countries, unite States in particular believes that it is their duty to bring democracy to other countries. act to transfer the western lifestyle to totally different locations with complex chronicle and traditions is not an easy task. Besides, when people are bullied into following a all different system, people are most likely to oppose it. at presents fully functional democratic countries ack nowledge Spain, Portugal, Greece, etc which were once holdd by dictators and only turned into democracies after homegrown movements and the politically instable countries include Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt, etc where democracy was imposed. Thus, we can see that imposing democracy has led to nought but disruption in the long term. imposing democracy has caused more disruption than peace. The white mans burden as the movement is most popularly referred to , has caused much tension between the west and the east. Imposing democracy in countries where people prioritize values like godliness and stability is not going to be successful as the people are not going to be cooperative. And the government formed that is not formed for the people is, by definition not a democracy. Democracy, even if established by imposition will still be the rule of the majority however for the people to truly accept this form of governance it must grow naturally.