.

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Toulmin Argument

Abby Boyce face 1201 Professor McGehee 10/22/2012 Cover Sheet a) Who is your earshot? My audience applies to incessantly soyone in the US. My audience is very kind beca drill my topic touches base on an discover that foot or could potenti alto take a craphery affect anyone directly or indirectly as wellspring. b) How would you like your readers to describe the personality you present on the page? My personality is confident. I regard in my argument and have strongly about(predicate) it. c) What question does your paper answer? It answers the question as to whether or non in that respect is an issue with natural law atrociousness. ) Whats your dissertation/ decl ar? Something needs to be done directly to end the frenzy and cope withd discipline universe inflicted on our citizens. The harsh discipline we argon discovering is beingness used to a greater extent and much ofttimes should not be tolerated. Abby Boyce slope 1201 Professor McGehee 10/22/2012 Toulmin Q uestionnaire Claim Questions Whats my birdcall? Something needs to be done immediately to end the violence and inappropriate discipline being inflicted on our citizens. The harsh discipline we argon discovering is being used more and more very much should not be tolerated.Is it legal? What makes it valid? -Yes. Its valid because I have lots of cause and quotes from sources to back me up as well as strong warrants and financial support to patron support me as well. I truly believe in my claim and depart defend it fully. Is it practical? Can it actually be acted out? Yes, and yes. It touches base on a topic that is growing and become a king-size job in society. Using sociological scathe it is becoming a macro problem. Its no longer a micro one. Are at that place qualifications I essential make to my claim?Im not necessarily sure this question pertains well to my topic specifically, but I dont line up there argon any qualifications I must obtain to be able to state and back up my claim new(prenominal)wise than the fact that you must have some good evidence and knowledge on the topic. What pass on be some possible challenges to my claim? Some whitethorn oppose by saying the media is making patrol brutality into a larger issue than it really is, or that the violence constabulary use is warrant as self-defence. Who could benefit most from accepting my claim? Who may be harmed or benefit the least?All citizens can benefit. The batch that may not agree or like my claim is the police departments who hired police police officers who have been offenders of police brutality. rationality questions What atomic number 18 my campaign? accord to the St. capital of Minnesota yearly analysis, in 2010 crime rates for homicides only if have shot up 9% since 2001. In 1982, the federal giving medication funded a Police Services submit in which over 12,000 indiscriminately selected citizens were interviewed in three metropolitan atomic number 18as. Do I have qualified evidence to support my claim? Yes.I used pieces of quotes from the StarTribune as well as statistics from a trusted website. Do I have pieces of evidence that are compelling? Least compelling? Some of my quotes are more authoritative than others. The statistics I used are stronger than the quotes I used from the StarTribune because the quotes seem more like an tone rather than a square fact. Warrant questions What are my Warrants? To believe there is an issue with the fell nicety system, you must notice the problem as well as believe that cops are not apt to nflict physical make fun on citizens, they are trained to wait on the community and to only get physical when demonstrating self-defense. Of course believe that cops can be racially discriminating, means that you must believe racism is simmer drink down a common problem in todays society. What other warrants may underlie the ones I have identified? There were a few different warrants I could have made for my grounds. For example, the first I could have said that in order to believe that police are role models you must believe that in most situations cops do or have benefited the community in some way shape or form.Am I prepared to stand behind my warrant, regardless of the opposing views? Yes. I truly believe in where I stand on this issue and I believe I have a strong argument. accompaniment Questions What is my backing? Cops must complete a devil year ground level before they can be a certify officer. Its soundless a expectant problem because people are not carry enough concern to it for it to be recognized. Does my backing apply in all cases? Why or why not? Yes. My backing is aimed to back-up my warrants to the best of my ability. Abby Boyce English 1201Professor McGehee 10/22/2012 Formal Outline I. In the middle of bighearted daylight, wonderful 28th, 2012, laid a man helpless and defenseless subsequently(prenominal) being lay offed, beat, and sprayed repeatedly with a chemical irritant. a. Refer to StarTribune article and prove background/situation that happened b. Claim Something needs to be done immediately to end the violence and inappropriate discipline being inflicted on our citizens. The harsh discipline we are discovering is being used more and more often should not be tolerated. II.Cops, especially street cops, are supposed to be the role-models of the community and are hired to benefit the community, not harm it. a. thou Give statistics from St. Paul homicide ratings b. Grounds Define police brutality c. Grounds engagement quote from the StarTribune III. Warrant To believe there is an issue with the criminal justice system, you must recognize the problem as well as believe that cops are not trained to inflict physical abuse on citizens, they are trained to help the community and to only get physical when demonstrating self-defense. a.Backing Cops must complete a two year degree before they can be a certifie d officer. The reason for this is so that they can learn the ethics that must be used speckle on duty as well as many other classes that teach the duties that must be performed and how to go about them. IV. Claim We are discovering that most brutality is directed against nonage groups or otherwise helpless populations. a. The importance of understanding racism in the context of police brutality needs to be brought to attendance and is extremely out of line. b. Grounds commendation CliffNotes. com V.Warrant Of course accept that cops can be racially discriminating, means that you must believe racism is still a common problem in todays society. a. Backing Its still a big problem because people are not bringing enough charge to it for it to be recognized. b. Grounds Use example that relates to my experience c. Grounds Use CliffNotes quote VI. Qualifier With all that said, there is only one exclusion to my argument which is, if a citizen threatens to use a lethal weapon on an off icer or if a citizen gets physically violent against an officer, accordingly physically res dressing that person is reasonable and just.In officer training schools they are taught to use self-defense when necessary. a. Once put into physical restraints or if the citizen has calmed down or promised to cooperate, the self-defense should end immediately. b. Officers can and should always remain on high peppy though. VII. If we want our officers to be treated with respect, and our 911 systems to be effective to end crime, then police brutality should not be tolerated and should end immediately in order to keep citizens safe and ensured that our criminal justice system is workings to benefit the community in a corroborative way. Abby BoyceEnglish 1201 Professor McGehee 10/22/2012 Police Brutality Awareness In the middle of broad daylight, August 28th, 2012, laid a man helpless and defenseless after being kicked, beat, and sprayed repeatedly with a chemical irritant. We later come to arise out that man is named Eric Hightower, and according to the article Police Brutality in the Age of YouTube in the StarTribune, he has had previous run-ins with the law, but on August 28th his offense that caused the policeman (St. Paul officer Jesse Zilge) to violently kick and beat this man, while he lie on a St. Paul sidewalk, is unknown.Shortly after the incident a video was posted on YouTube, which provided solid evidence that this cop was completely out of line. But its not the first time there have been issues with the morality and brutality of our local anaesthetic and nationwide officers. Something needs to be done immediately to end the violence and inappropriate discipline being inflicted on our citizens. The harsh discipline we are discovering is being used more and more often should not be tolerated. Cops, especially street cops, are supposed to be the role-models of the community and are hired to benefit the community, not harm it.According to the St. Paul yearly analysis, in 2010 crime rates for homicides alone have shot up 9% since 2001. Many of those crimes may have been easily prevented if cops had been doing their job correctly and utilize appropriate punishment only when needed. Many citizens have become stir to call 911 and involve the police because they dont trust the actions they will take. In reality, the police should be making you feel at simpleness and knowing you can call them for help should be something people should feel comfortable doing.Police brutality is defined as the intentional use of luxuriant mightiness by a police officer. It takes many forms, including physical abuse, oral attacks, and psychological intimidation. In the most recent years, we are seeing more and more cops being put on trial for their violent conduct. The legend of Eric Hightower is just one of the many recently reported and investigated stories of victimized citizens being put in physical harm by cops. Its first gear to make many of us wo nder how many times there have been incidents like this in the past that have never been reported.It was brought to my attention more closely than ever when it was as stated in the StartTribune, If an officer can kick someone in front of witnesses and a camera, how often do those types of attacks happen at night when cameras arent rolling? Of course, to believe there is an issue with the criminal justice system, you must recognize the problem as well as believe that cops are not trained to inflict physical abuse on citizens, they are trained to help the community and to only get physical when demonstrating self-defense.Even when using self-defense should it ever be okay to kick someone, along with slam someones head onto the car hood (according to the StarTribune in the Hightower story)? The answer is no. If cops are supposed to be preventing physical abuse and fighting why on earth would it ever be okay for them to use it. Cops must complete a two year degree before they can be a certified officer. The reason for this is so that they can learn the ethics that must be used while on duty as well as many other classes that teach the duties that must be performed and how to go about them.Knowing that, I have a very hard time believing there is any circumstance an officer could say that they were unaware their behaviour was out of line. We are discovering that most brutality is directed against minority groups or otherwise powerless populations. Officers who engage in brutality rationalize their use of inappropriate force by claiming they are punishing those groups that threaten to calve the social order. The importance of understanding racism in the context of police brutality needs to be brought to attention and is extremely out of line.Many police automatically regard racial minority group members as potentially dangerous regardless of their particular activities, gestures, or attire. This perception of racial minority citizens as trouble sometimes translate s into racially discriminatory police behavior. According to CliffNotes. com, In 1982, the federal government funded a Police Services Study in which over 12,000 randomly selected citizens were interviewed in three metropolitan areas. The check found that 13 percent of those surveyed had been victims of police brutality the previous year.Yet only 30 percent of those who acknowledged such brutality filed formal complaints. I would be willing to bet that over 50% of those citizens, who endured the police brutality, are minorities or racially different from the cop that inflicted the abuse upon them. Of course believing that cops can be racially discriminating, means that you must believe racism is still a common problem in todays society. Which in fact, it most definitely is. Its still a big problem because people are not bringing enough attention to it for it to be recognized.For example, before reading the article in the StarTribune and prior to taking a Criminal Justice class th at focused on the racially discriminating cops, I had no idea this was even an issue. It needs to be brought in the public eye so that people can croak voluntarily coming forward and so the problem can be solved nationwide. I believe we this is a realistic request and foretaste for our future, because recently Departments in some cities, for example, have adopted special training programs to reduce incidents of police brutality.Other departments have formulated rules that limit the use of force by the police. Preventive control also requires supervising officers (for example, conducting surveillance of officers work) and disciplining those who interrupt departmental standards. A few amount of cities aroung the US are development early warning systems to identify officers with high rates of citizen complaints. These incidents should be investigated, and if verified, the officers winding should be charged, disciplined, restrained, and/or counseled.According to CliffNotes. com, Pi ttsburgh, for example, launched a $1. 5 million computer system. It monitors either aspect of an officers professional lifefrom the number of citizen complaints filed against the officer to the race of every person the officer arrests. With all that said, there is only one exception to my argument which is, if a citizen threatens to use a lethal weapon on an officer or if a citizen gets physically violent against an officer, then physically restraining that person is reasonable and just.In officer training schools they are taught to use self-defense when necessary. Many officers though, are abusing that privilege. Once put into physical restraints or if the citizen has calmed down or promised to cooperate, the self-defense should end immediately. This does not mean that the officer should not be on high alert, but physically, he or she should not be getting physical with the citizen. If we want our officers to be treated with respect, and our 911 systems to be effective to end cri me, then police brutality should not be tolerated and should end mmediately in order to keep citizens safe and ensured that our criminal justice system is working to benefit the community in a positive way. Abby Boyce English 1201 Professor McGehee 10/22/2012Citations CliffsNotes. com. Police Brutality. 21 Oct 2012 lthttp//www. cliffsnotes. com/study_guide/topicArticleId-10065,articleId-9975. hypertext markup languagegt. Editorial Board, . Police brutality in the age of YouTube. StartTribune. 09 2012 1. Web. 21 Oct. 2012. lthttp//www. startribune. com/opinion/editorials/168689626. html? refer=ygt.

No comments:

Post a Comment